New commander of NATO will war with Russia, "if deterrence doesn't work"

New commander of allied forces in Europe, General Curtis, Scaparrotti expressed the readiness of the Alliance to fight the "aggressive" Russia, "if deterrence doesn't work". As Radio Free Europe writes that the commander in chief has pledged to achieve placement of a permanent military brigade in the region, and to review the rules of conduct for the allies because of "provocative" actions of the Russian VKS.

New commander of allied forces in Europe, General Curtis Scaparrotti, who succeeded General Philip Breedlove, says that the Alliance is "ready to fight, if intimidation doesn't work," reports Radio Free Europe.

"We are faced with the growing power of Russia and its aggressive behavior, which is inconsistent with international norms", – said Scaparotti.

As explained by the source, the General took command of allied forces in Europe on may 4. And its purpose is to strengthen the Alliance in the region, after several years of withdrawal of US troops from EU countries.

Scaparotti, promised to get Washington's permission for the placement of the third constant brigade of the American armed forces in Europe. The other two are based in Germany and Italy. Today in the region constantly there are only 65 000 of the us military, when during the cold war, the number reached 300 000.

However, instead of permanent teams Washington prefers to alternately place and return for more troops in Europe. It helps America reassure our allies from the Baltic States and Eastern Europe who see Russia as a threat.

Another and perhaps more urgent task for Scaparotti is to define clear boundaries beyond which NATO will not tolerate the growing aggression by Russian forces".

According to Radio Free Europe, Russian military planes regularly flying near NATO ships in the Baltic and Black seas. And so close of the meeting raised fears that they could escalate into direct confrontation.

"I think they test our determination," commented the General, who considers such behavior of the Russian VKS "provocative" and "dangerous". Scaparotti assured that one of his first actions as military commander will be the revision of the rules of engagement in conflicts for the US and its allies, if they see a security risk.

Earlier, the General was chief of the American armed forces in Korea, and before that served in Iraq and Afghanistan, adds a portal.

Original news Inotv:

https://russian.rt.com/inotv/2...

Then....

Israel decides to upgrade ties with NATO

NATO announced that it agreed that an official Israeli mission be established at NATO headquarters. (File photo: AP)

AFP, JerusalemWednesday, 4 May 2016

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Wednesday that Israel would upgrade its ties with the 28-member NATO military alliance by opening a permanent mission to its Brussels headquarters.

"Israel will accept the invitation and open an office, in the near future," Netanyahu said at the start of a cabinet meeting.

"The countries of the world want to cooperate with us because of our determined fight against terror, our technicological know-how, our intelligence network and other things," his office quoted him as saying.

NATO announced on Tuesday that it agreed that "an official Israeli mission be established at NATO headquarters" with the Israeli envoy to Belgium as head of the mission.

An Israeli expert told AFP that the move was a result of pressure from other NATO members on Turkey, which joined in 1952, to drop its veto on closer alliance ties with its former ally.

"It's a Turkish confidence-building measure vis-a-vis Israel," said Tommy Steiner, an expert on NATO-Israel ties at the Institute for Policy and Strategy near Tel Aviv.

"Since the introduction of the new (NATO) partnership policy in 2014 Israel was formally invited," he said. "But Israel never did that because there was a Turkish veto on such a measure."

Turkey was a key regional ally of Israel until the two cut ties in 2010 over the deadly storming by Israeli commandos of the Mavi Marmara, a Turkish aid ship bound for Gaza, which left 10 Turkish activists dead.

After years of bitter accusations and rhetoric the two sides held secret talks in December on a rapprochement, with another round taking place in February in Geneva

"Following the Mavi Marmara affair, Turkey blocked everything (at NATO) concerning Israel," a Brussels-based diplomat told AFP. "In order to avoid discrimination (NATO) did not therefore open any other foreign mission."

"After five years the Turks lifted their objections" allowing for the establishment of missions for Israel and for other states, the diplomat said.

Steiner said that the geographically and politically diverse NATO grouping would not invite Israel into a full-fledged mutual-defence pact.

"Israel is not going to be a full member, it's not on the cards," he said. "Israel will be officially accredited to NATO, it will have a permanent mission at NATO headquarters as a partner."

Israel already participates in military exercises with NATO members other than Turkey, notably the United States.

Then....

A Synopsis of the Israel/Palestine Conflict

The following is a very short synopsis of the history of this conflict. We recommend that you also read the much more detailed account, "The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict."

Synopsis of History & Toll of the Conflict – One-Page Flyer

For centuries there was no such conflict. In the 19th century the land of Palestine was inhabited by a multicultural population – approximately 86 percent Muslim, 10 percent Christian, and 4 percent Jewish – living in peace.[1]

Zionism

In the late 1800s a group in Europe decided to colonize this land. Known as Zionists, they represented an extremist minority of the Jewish population. Their goal was to create a Jewish homeland, and they considered locations in Africa and the Americas, before settling on Palestine.[2]

Historic Palestine more maps

At first, this immigration created no problems. However, as more and more Zionists immigrated to Palestine – many with the express wish of taking over the land for a Jewish state – the indigenous population became increasingly alarmed. Eventually, fighting broke out, with escalating waves of violence. Hitler’s rise to power, combined with Zionist activities to sabotage efforts to place Jewish refugees in western countries[3], led to increased Jewish immigration to Palestine, and conflict grew.

UN Partition Plan

Finally, in 1947 the United Nations decided to intervene. However, rather than adhering to the principle of “self-determination of peoples,” in which the people themselves create their own state and system of government, the UN chose to revert to the medieval strategy whereby an outside power divides up other people’s land.

UN Plan of Partition more maps

Under considerable Zionist pressure, the UN recommended giving away 55% of Palestine to a Jewish state – despite the fact that this group represented only about 30% of the total population, and owned under 7% of the land.

1947-1949 War

While it is widely reported that the resulting war eventually included five Arab armies, less well known is the fact that throughout this war Zionist forces outnumbered all Arab and Palestinian combatants combined – often by a factor of two to three. Moreover, Arab armies did not invade Israel – virtually all battles were fought on land that was to have been the Palestinian state.

Finally, it is significant to note that Arab armies entered the conflict only after Zionist forces had committed 16 massacres, including the grisly massacre of over 100 men, women, and children at Deir Yassin. Future Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, head of one of the Jewish terrorist groups, described this as “splendid,” and stated: “As in Deir Yassin, so everywhere, we will attack and smite the enemy. God, God, Thou has chosen us for conquest.” Zionist forces committed 33 massacres altogether.[4]

By the end of the war, Israel had conquered 78 percent of Palestine; three-quarters of a million Palestinians had been made refugees; over 500 towns and villages had been obliterated; and a new map was drawn up, in which every city, river and hillock received a new, Hebrew name, as all vestiges of the Palestinian culture were to be erased. For decades Israel denied the existence of this population, former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir once saying: “There were no such thing as Palestinians.”[5]

1967 Occupation more maps

1967 War & USS Liberty

In 1967, Israel conquered still more land. Following the “Six Day War,” in which Israeli forces launched a highly successful surprise attack on Egypt, Israel occupied the final 22% of Palestine that had eluded it in 1948 – the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Since, according to international law it is inadmissible to acquire territory by war, these are occupied territories and do not belong to Israel. It also occupied parts of Egypt (since returned) and Syria (which remain under occupation).

Also during the Six Day War, Israel attacked a US Navy ship, the USS Liberty, killing and injuring over 200 American servicemen. President Lyndon Johnson recalled rescue flights, saying that he did not want to “embarrass an ally.” (In 2004 a high-level commission chaired by Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, found this attack to be “an act of war against the United States,” a fact few news media have reported.)[6]

Current Conflict

There are two primary issues at the core of this continuing conflict. First, there is the inevitably destabilizing effect of trying to maintain an ethnically preferential state, particularly when it is largely of foreign origin.[7] The original population of what is now Israel was 96 percent Muslim and Christian, yet, these refugees are prohibited from returning to their homes in the self-described Jewish state (and those within Israel are subjected to systematic discrimination).[8]

Second, Israel’s continued military occupation and confiscation of privately owned land in the West Bank, and control over Gaza, are extremely oppressive, with Palestinians having minimal control over their lives.[9] Thousands of Palestinian men, women, and children are held in Israeli prisons.[10] Few of them have had a legitimate trial; Physical abuse and torture are frequent.[11] Palestinian borders (even internal ones) are controlled by Israeli forces.[12] Periodically men, women, and children are strip searched[13]; people are beaten; women in labor are prevented from reaching hospitals (at times resulting in death)[14]; food and medicine are blocked from entering Gaza, producing an escalating humanitarian crisis. Israeli forces invade almost daily, injuring, kidnapping, and sometimes killing inhabitants.[15]

According to the Oslo peace accords of 1993, these territories were supposed to finally become a Palestinian state. However, after years of Israel continuing to confiscate land and conditions steadily worsening, the Palestinian population rebelled. (The Barak offer, widely reputed to be generous, was anything but.[16]) This uprising, called the “Intifada” (Arabic for “shaking off”) began at the end of September 2000.

U.S. Involvement

Largely due to special-interest lobbying, U.S. taxpayers give Israel an average of $8 million per day, and since its creation have given more U.S. funds to Israel than to any other nation.[17] As Americans learn about how Israel is using our tax dollars, many are calling for an end to this expenditure.

Notes

[1] John W. Mulhall, CSP, America and the Founding of Israel: an Investigation of the Morality of America’s Role (Los Angeles: Deshon, 1995), 48; Mike Berry and Greg Philo, Israel and Palestine(Pluto Press, 2006) p. 1; Mazin Qumsiyeh, PhD, author of Sharing the Land of Canaan: Human Rights and the Israeli-Palestinian Struggle, includes a number of population tables in this book, which are available in his booklet, Palestinian Refugees Right to Return and Repatriation(http://ifamericansknew.org/history/ref-qumsiyeh.html); Justin McCarthy, author of The Population of Palestine: Population History and Statistics of the Late Ottoman Period and the Mandate, provides detailed information on population in the excerpt “Palestine’s Population During The Ottoman And The British Mandate Periods.” (http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Palestine-Remembered/Story559.html)

[2] John W. Mulhall, CSP, America and the Founding of Israel: an Investigation of the Morality of America’s Role (Los Angeles: Deshon, 1995), 47-52.

[3] In many places Zionists manipulated local Jewish populations into going to Palestine/Israel, in some cases using subterfuge and terrorism.

Sami Hadawi, Bitter Harvest, p. 37: “Commenting, author Erskine H. Childers, wrote, “one of the most massively important features of the entire Palestine struggle was that Zionism deliberately arranged that the plight of the wretched survivors of Hitlerism should be a ‘moral argument’ which the West had to accept. This was done by seeing to it that Western countries did not open their doors, widely and immediately, to the inmates of the DP. (displaced persons) camps. It is incredible, that so grave and grim a campaign has received so little attention in accounts of the Palestine struggle – it was a campaign that literally shaped all subsequent history. It was done by sabotaging specific Western schemes to admit Jewish DPs.”

A number of authors have discuss Zionist connections with Nazis; for example:

• Ben Hecht, Perfidy

• Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement: The Dramatic Story of the Pact Between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine

• Lenni Brenner, 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis

• Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem

• Sami Hadawi, in Bitter Harvest 1914-79, pp. 35-39, discusses the use of manipulated, sometimes invented, anti-Semitism in promoting Zionism, e.g.: “Ian Gilmour [wrote] ‘In the Arab countries, Jewish difficulties and emigration to Israel were the result not of anti-Semitism but of Zionist activities and the existence of the state of Israel.’”

• In “The Jews of Iraq,” The Link, April-May 1998, Naeim Giladi describes Zionist activities to push Jews to emigrate to Israel.

He describes this in greater detail in his book: Ben-Gurion’s Scandals: How the Haganah and the Mossad Eliminated Jews:

“I write this book to tell the American people, and especially the American Jews, that Jews from Islamic lands did not emigrate willingly to Israel; that, to force them to leave, Jews killed Jews; and that, to buy time to confiscate ever more Arab lands, Jews on numerous occasions rejected genuine peace initiatives from their Arab neighbors. I write about what the first prime minister of Israel called ‘cruel Zionism.’ I write about it because I was a part of it.”

[4] Qumsiyeh, Palestinian Refugees Right to Return and Repatriation(http://ifamericansknew.org/history/ref-qumsiyeh.html)

Norman Finkelstein, Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict; George W. Ball & Douglas B. Ball, The Passionate Attachment, on p. 29: quotes a message from future prime minister Menachem Begin, head of the Irgun Zionist terrorist group, commending them on the grisly massacre of women, children, and old men at the village of Deir Yassin: “’Accept my congratulations on this splendid act of conquest. Convey my regards to all the commanders and soldiers. We shake your hands. We are all proud of the excellent leadership and the fighting spirit in this great attack. We stand to attention in memory of the slain. We lovingly shake the hands of the wounded. Tell the soldiers: you have made history in Israel with your attack and your conquest. Continue thus until victory. As in Deir Yassin, so everywhere, we will attack and smite the enemy. God, God, Thou has chosen us for conquest.’”

[5] Sunday Times, June 15, 1969, quoted widely.

[6] Donald Neff, The Six Days War, Simon & Schuster

During the Six-Day War, Israel also attacked a US Navy ship, the USS Liberty, killing and injuring over 200 American servicemen. Many analysts believe that the fact that there were no consequences for this attack led Israeli leaders to conclude that they could commit any act of aggression without US complaint. While this attack has largely been covered up in the US media (see “American Media Miss the Boat: For USA Today, Freedom of the Press Means the Right to Report It Wrong”http://ifamericansknew.org/media/misslib.html, Alison Weir, CounterPunch, June 23/24, 2007), it is discussed in a number of books, including James Ennes, The Assault on the Liberty; William Gerhard,Attack on the USS Liberty; Dr. John Borne, The USS Liberty, Dissenting History vs. Official History; Stephen Green , Taking Sides: America’s Secret Relations with a Militant Israel; James Bamford, Body of Secrets; and in a recent article: “New revelations in attack on American spy ship Veterans, documents suggest U.S., Israel didn’t tell full story of deadly ’67 incident,” John Crewdson, Tribune senior correspondent, Chicago Tribune, October 2, 2007 (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-liberty_tuesoct02,0,66005.story?coll=chi_tab01_layout).

Additional information can be found at:

http://www.ussliberty.org/

http://ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/ussliberty.html

[7] This is touched on in: John V. Whitbeck, “What ‘Israel’s right to exist’ means to Palestinians,”Christian Science Monitor, Feb 2, 2007, http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/rte.html

[8] See, for example, Qumsiyeh, Palestinian Refugees Right to Return and Repatriation(http://ifamericansknew.org/history/ref-qumsiyeh.html)

United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East,http://www.unrwa.org/

[9] For more on the current situation and life under occupation:

http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/

http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/daily_life-articles.html

[10] http://ifamericansknew.org/stat/prisoners.html

[11] See, for example, B’Tselem – The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, “Absolute Prohibition: The torture and Ill-Treatment of Palestinian Detainees,” May 2007,http://www.btselem.org/publications/summaries/200705_utterly_forbidden

Defence for Children International/Palestine Section, http://www.dci-palestine.org/theme/detention

Addameer, Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association, http://www.addameer.org/index.php

Samidoun, Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network, http://samidoun.ca/

[12] http://ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/checkpoints.html

[13] Israeli Strip Searches: A Partial List, http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/strip-searches.html

[14] http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/68births.html

[15] http://ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/invasions-articles.html

[16] “Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Camp David Peace Proposal of July, 2000 and Barak’s so-called Generous Offer,” http://ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/processfaq.html

[17] http://www.ifamericansknew.org/stat/usaid.html

#Politics #MiddleEast #BoycottIsrael #BDS #Wars #ISIS #Warcrimes